1. Integrity and Honesty

It is one of code of conduct for Forensic scientists.

• Uphold truthfulness and transparency in all professional activities.
• Never manipulate, alter, or invent data or findings.
• Base conclusions solely on verifiable evidence and sound scientific practice.

2.Impartiality and Objectivity

• Maintain neutrality in all investigations, regardless of the party involved.
• Refrain from engaging in any activity that could lead to bias or create a perceived conflict of interest.
• Resist influence from external forces, including legal, institutional, or public pressure.

3.Professional Competence

• Accept assignments only when qualified through training, education, or experience.
• Engage in regular skill development through courses, certifications, or seminars.
• Know and acknowledge personal professional boundaries; request expert input when needed.

4.Confidentiality

• Safeguard all sensitive case details unless disclosure is legally mandated or formally authorized.
• Do not share case-related information in public forums or with unauthorized individuals.

5.Clear and Accurate Reporting

• Keep thorough, consistent records for all analytical and investigative work.
• Ensure all reports reflect the facts, remain unbiased, and avoid unsupported opinions.
• Transparently disclose uncertainties, limitations, or conditions affecting findings.

6.Commitment to Quality Standards

• Follow accredited lab procedures and uphold recognized forensic quality guidelines (e.g., ISO standards).
• Take part in routine quality control activities, including audits and proficiency testing.
• Immediately report any procedural mistakes, misconduct, or deviations from protocols.

7.Ethical Courtroom Behaviour

• Provide evidence-based testimony within one’s field of competence.
• Clearly separate factual statements from interpretive opinions during testimony.
• Avoid overstating the impact or certainty of forensic results when addressing the court.

8.Respect for Persons and Rights

• Treat all individuals involved in the forensic process-victims, suspects, and peers-with dignity and fairness.
• Ensure that scientific practices do not contribute to injustice, such as false accusations or wrongful convictions.

9.Ethical and Professional Conduct

• Steer clear of professional engagements that may involve ethical compromise or personal interest.
• Demonstrate integrity and respect in all workplace and investigative interactions.
• .Support the responsible growth of forensic science through mentorship, research, and
  ethical innovation.

Qualifications for Forensic Scientists.

Educational qualification

Bachelor’s degree (BSc) in one of the following fields:

• Forensic Science
• Biology
• Chemistry
• Biochemistry
• Molecular Biology
• Physics
• Criminalistics
• Master’s degree (MSc) in
• Specialize in a specific area such as:
• Forensic Toxicology
• Forensic Biology/DNA
• Forensic Chemistry
• Digital Forensics
• Forensic Psychology

Skill

• Critical thinking
• Communication skills
• Objectivity and impartiality
• Time management

Report Writing

1.Cover Page & Contents List

Start your report with key case identification:

• Investigation title or reference number
• Name of the assigned forensic expert
• Submission date
• Affiliated organization or department
• Follow it with a well-organized table of contents to help readers navigate the report with ease.

2.Overview of the Case

Provide a brief and clear summary of the investigation:

• Why the investigation was initiated
• What general steps were followed during analysis
• Highlight the main outcomes or findings
• This section is aimed at readers with no technical background and should avoid complex language.

3.Case Context and Objectives

Set the foundation for the report by answering:

• Who requested the forensic examination?
• What are the main questions or concerns that need addressing?
• Were there any boundaries or limitations affecting the investigation?
• This section outlines the “why” and “how far” of the inquiry.

4.Tools and Methods Used

This part should describe how the analysis was carried out:

• Names and versions of all tools or equipment used
• Description of each process or procedure used during analysis
• Any particular configurations or settings applied
• This ensures another qualified expert could reproduce the investigation under the same conditions.

5.Description of Evidence

This is the core section where all relevant evidence is presented:

• What kinds of evidence were examined (e.g., digital files, physical samples, images)?
• How and where was each item recovered or collected?
• Include visual elements such as diagrams, tables, or photographs
• If applicable, include verification techniques like hash values to confirm data integrity
• Stick to factual details onlyp-this section should not contain analysis or opinions.

6. Interpretation of Results

Now, explain what the findings mean in relation to the case:

• How do the findings support or contradict the case questions?
• Are there any other logical explanations for the results?
• Interpretations must be based on proven methods or scientific reasoning
• This is the analytical heart of the report where facts meet context.

7.Summary and Action Points

Bring the report to a close with a final assessment:

• Clearly state which facts are supported, challenged, or unresolved
• Recommend further analysis, interviews, or follow-ups if necessary
• Avoid personal opinions-focus solely on what the data supports
• This is where decisions are informed, not made.

8.Supporting Documents & References

End the report with materials that back up the investigation:

• Raw output data or analysis logs
• Screenshots from tools used in the process
• Definitions for technical terms used in the report
• List of all resources, tools, or legal standards cited
• This section ensures transparency and professional accountability.